You got raided
A competitor took a partner, team, or practice leader. Is it staffing noise, client risk, or a lane-defense problem?
Send the firm, the practice lane, and the move you are watching. We map the public signals and tell you whether to defend, flank, amplify, or ignore it.
Fit check
If none of these are live, you probably do not need a read yet.
A competitor took a partner, team, or practice leader. Is it staffing noise, client risk, or a lane-defense problem?
You bought capability. Does the market understand what you are building, or is it trapped in a press release?
You still have the bench. They are buying the build story. Do you defend, flank, amplify, or ignore?
What comes back
Built to be read by a partner in five minutes. Facts first, inference labeled, decision on top.
Engagements
Start with the narrow read when one move is on the table. Go deeper when the answer changes spend, messaging, hiring, or partner focus.
A private first pass on one named move, lane, or competitor buildout.
The full read when the answer affects spend, messaging, hiring, or partner focus.
A standing watch on competitor movement before it becomes a partner surprise.
Guardrails
Firm announcements, attorney bios, competitor pages, legal alerts, ads, rankings, job posts, social, search language, and public news. No confidential data.
No. We do not source candidates. We use public lateral movement as a market signal: who is buying which capability, what lane that points to, and whether the firm should defend, flank, amplify, or ignore it.
No. We map public movement and show where risk or opportunity appears concentrated. That is pattern work, not certainty, and the read stays inside public-source evidence.
Then that is the answer. A good read should sometimes stop a firm from spending on another page, campaign, hire, or content push.
Firm, practice lane, competitor, and the decision on the table. We will tell you if a private read is worth doing.